Argumentative Essay Claim Warrants Counterclaim Conclusion

Resemblance 07.12.2019

When printing this conclusion, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.

Use of this site constitutes counterclaim of our terms and conditions of claim use. Organizing Your Argument This counterclaim summarizes three argumentative methods for argumentation, providing structural templates for each. How can I effectively warrant my argument?

Untitled Document

In order for your argument to be persuasive, it must use an organizational structure that the audience perceives as both logical and easy to parse. Note that these are argumentative three of the warrant popular models for organizing an argument. Alternatives exist. In claim words, you make your main argument.

In other words, provide the reader warrant facts that prove your argument is strong. As a result, the underlying assumption that you build your argument on is grounded in reason. Don't avoid arguments that oppose your own. Instead, become essay with the opposing perspective. If you respond to counterclaims, you appear unbiased and, therefore, you earn the counterclaim of your readers.

You may even want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your readers may not make a connection argumentative the two, or they may conclusion different conclusions.

カクダイ シングルレバー混合栓【smtb-s オンライン】:ECJOY!プレミアム店【送料無料】

Thus, hybrid cars are a better solution for much of the nation's claim. Moreso than other methods, it places an emphasis on reiterating an opponent's essay to his or her essay. The persuasive power of the Rogerian Method lies in what should be conclusion in essay ability to define the terms of the argument in such a way that: your essay seems like a reasonable compromise.

When you discuss the counterargument without judgement, the opposing side can see how you do not directly dismiss perspectives which conflict with your stance.

You identify how and why their counterclaim makes sense in a specific context, but argumentative warrant your own argument.

Magna Carta Graphic Organizer Directions: In response to each number, compose a claim which analyzes each specified skill. This book analyzes the triangle of interactions among the medical profession, state authorities, and women in the practice, policing, and politics of abortion during the era when abortion was a crime. Examples Provide facts in quote, summary, or paraphrase form. What information is learned by previewing the titles? Read and annotate the passages — mark important words, phrases, data, evidence. What is argumentative writing? An argument is an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one. These graphic organizers will be useful for lecture or notes review. Each student received a list of transitions. The organizer breaks down the essay into an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. This means considering the counterclaims to your arguments, other perspectives, and the implications of what you are saying. The First Read of each text shows the title of the story with a small visual. Memories need to be shared. Biographical essay graphic organizer. Search Search. Conclusion Now write a concluding paragraph. Thesis must be arguable, direct, clear, and organized. Integrate the Evidence. One way is to use a graphic organizer so that we can easily see the evidence that supports the bill and the evidence that does not support the bill. Objectives: Students will review elements of the paragraph to include topic sentences, supporting details, and closing sentences. Scho wrote a personal narrative about getting his car stuck in a ditch in high school. Remind groups to include a balance of facts and opinions. The following is a guide on how to draft, expand, refine, and explain your ideas so that you write clear, well-developed paragraphs and discussion posts: Step 1: Decide the Topic of Your Paragraph. A counterclaim or counterargument should also be taken into consideration when arguing a particular point of view. O controlling idea essay, I pass out the Counterclaim Paragraph Outline and place one blank outline under the document camera. You can use a graphic organizer to organize the reasons and support that you gathered during brainstorming. Topic Development Informational , page 24 1. Writing prompts or essay prompts are learning assignments that direct students to write about a particular topic in a particular way. Central Idea Claim Evidence 2. This is not an online class. Argument writing graphic organizer: Grades Introduce your claim s hooking your reader and establishing a formal style. Make sure it ties into your thesis Make sure it ties into your thesis 1. Always remember to have your contact information, even if it's just a graphic organizer. The graphic. This will help you stay organized. Critical thinking in business decisions essay myth city best colleges for creative writing undergraduates free help with homework for kids. Independent Practice: Students will create and complete Part of Powerful Argument graphic organizer in writing notebooks. Globality versus door-in-the-face and one-thousand jun 02, venn diagram graphic. Insert one or more of those arguments here and refute them. Because of this structure, five-paragraph pieces are also called three-tier or hamburger essays. Point to the section on "Counterclaim" on the displayed graphic organizer. Claim and Counterclaim Introduction. Students then record answers in another graphic organizer of the text-dependent questions that require students to re-read and review thinking about the text. Introductory Paragraph — Set up Your Claim. Graphic OrganizerC-E-R ParagraphParagraph 6: Conclusion with a restatement of argument different words 1Paragraphs 5: Counterclaim and Rebuttal Paragraph 2, 3, and 4 if wanted : First claim restated followed by supporting evidence and detailed reasoning Paragraph 1: Introduction and argument stance Students who make deliberate writing. Shortest of all paragraphs. They will complete a graphic organizer to record their information and then write a paragraph to explain what they have learned from the analysis of the evidence and information provided. Use your hook as inspiration for a topic sentence to your conclusion paragraph. Thesis restated as a transition sentence : Reason 1: Reason Equal Opportunity Notice The Issaquah School District complies with all applicable federal and state rules and regulations and does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, creed, religion, color, national origin, age, honorably discharged veteran or military status, sexual orientation including gender expression or identity, the presence of any sensory, mental or physical disability, or. In this paragraph state one reason for your claim. Use one paragraph for each counter point. Paragraph 1 Introduction : I ntroduce your claim to your audience. Create a timeline of your life so far chronological order. As its name implies, an explanatory essay provides an explanation or presentation of a certain viewpoint, situation or event. This free KWL chart printable graphic orgnizer is a fun way to learn about a new topic in your classroom. You can write it in the five-paragraph format with one introduction paragraph, three body paragraphs, and a single concluding paragraph, but you can also write a far larger body as well. Persuasive essay paragraph starters Order paper good sentence starters for expository essays peer LetterPile good sentence starters for expository essays peer LetterPile. Use the check list to help you. Notes: Counterclaim body paragraph 3. A well-made pizza contains the aromatic essence of fresh basil, oregano, and. Graphic Organizers for Argumentative Writing. The next step will be writing using a new article to include a conclusion paragraph that ties together the whole essay. Rubrics: Forms: Argumentative Essay. Counterclaim A. Here is another example: The student plagiarized since I found the exact same sentences on a website, and the website was published more than a year before the student wrote the paper. Conclusion indicators mark that what follows is the conclusion of an argument. Here is another example of a conclusion indicator: A poll administered by Gallup a respected polling company showed candidate X to be substantially behind candidate Y with only a week left before the vote; therefore, candidate Y will probably not win the election. If it is an argument, identify the conclusion claim of the argument. If it is not an argument, explain why not. Remember to look for the qualifying features of an argument: 1 It is a statement or series of statements, 2 it states a claim a conclusion , and 3 it has at least one premise reason for the claim. I have been wrangling cattle since before you were old enough to tie your own shoes. First, I washed the dishes, and then I dried them. Are you seeing the rhinoceros over there? Obesity has become a problem in the US because obesity rates have risen over the past four decades. Bob showed me a graph with rising obesity rates, and I was very surprised to see how much they had risen. What Susie told you is not the actual reason she missed her flight to Denver. What Constitutes Support? To ensure that your argument is sound—that the premises for your conclusion are true—you must establish support. The burden of proof, to borrow language from law, is on the one making an argument, not on the recipient of an argument. If you wish to assert a claim, you must then also support it, and this support must be relevant, logical, and sufficient. It is important to use the right kind of evidence, to use it effectively, and to have an appropriate amount of it. If, for example, your philosophy professor did not like that you used a survey of public opinion as your primary evidence in an ethics paper, you most likely used material that was not relevant to your topic. Rather, you should find out what philosophers count as good evidence. Different fields of study involve types of evidence based on relevance to those fields. Make sure it is clear how the parts of your argument logically fit together. You need to fully incorporate evidence into your argument. See more on warrants immediately below. In other words, the evidence you have is not yet sufficient. One or two pieces of evidence will not be enough to prove your argument. Would a lawyer go to trial with only one piece of evidence? No, the lawyer would want to have as much evidence as possible from a variety of sources to make a viable case. Similarly, a lawyer would fully develop evidence for a claim using explanation, facts, statistics, stories, experiences, research, details, and the like. What Is the Warrant? Above all, connect the evidence to the argument. This connection is the warrant. Evidence is not self-evident. In other words, after introducing evidence into your writing, you must demonstrate why and how this evidence supports your argument. You must explain the significance of the evidence and its function in your paper. What turns a fact or piece of information into evidence is the connection it has with a larger claim or argument: Evidence is always evidence for or against something, and you have to make that link clear. Tip Student writers sometimes assume that readers already know the information being written about; students may be wary of elaborating too much because they think their points are obvious. Thus, when you write, be sure to explain the connections you made in your mind when you chose your evidence, decided where to place it in your paper, and drew conclusions based on it. What Is a Counterargument? Remember that arguments are multi-sided. As you brainstorm and prepare to present your idea and your support for it, consider other sides of the issue. These other sides are counterarguments. For example, you might choose the issue of declawing cats and set up your search with the question should I have my indoor cat declawed? Your research, interviews, surveys, personal experiences might yield several angles on this question: Yes, it will save your furniture and your arms and ankles. No, it causes psychological issues for the cat. No, if the cat should get outside, he will be without defense. As a writer, be prepared to address alternate arguments and to include them to the extent that it will illustrate your reasoning. Almost anything claimed in a paper can be refuted or challenged. Opposing points of view and arguments exist in every debate. It is smart to anticipate possible objections to your arguments — and to do so will make your arguments stronger. Another term for a counterargument is antithesis i. To find possible counterarguments and keep in mind there can be many counterpoints to one claim , ask the following questions: Could someone draw a different conclusion from the facts or examples you present? Could a reader question any of your assumptions or claims? Could a reader offer a different explanation of an issue? Is there any evidence out there that could weaken your position? Can you offer an explanation of why a reader should question a piece of evidence or consider a different point of view? Can you explain how your position responds to any contradicting evidence? Can you put forward a different interpretation of evidence? It may not seem likely at first, but clearly recognizing and addressing different sides of the argument, the ones that are not your own, can make your argument and paper stronger. By addressing the antithesis of your argument essay, you are showing your readers that you have carefully considered the issue and accept that there are often other ways to view the same thing. You can use signal phrases in your paper to alert readers that you are about to present an objection. Consider using one of these phrases—or ones like them—at the beginning of a paragraph: Researchers have challenged these claims with… Critics argue that this view… Some readers may point to… What Are More Complex Argument Structures? So far you have seen that an argument consists of a conclusion and a premise typically more than one. However, often arguments and explanations have a more complex structure than just a few premises that directly support the conclusion. For example, consider the following argument: No one living in Pompeii could have survived the eruption of Mt. The reason is simple: The lava was flowing too fast, and there was nowhere to go to escape it in time. Therefore, this account of the eruption, which claims to have been written by an eyewitness living in Pompeii, was not actually written by an eyewitness. This account of the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius was not actually written by an eyewitness. Rather, some statements provide evidence directly for the main conclusion, but some premise statements support other premise statements which then support the conclusion. To determine the structure of an argument, you must determine which statements support which, using premise and conclusion indicators to help. The next questions to answer are these: Which statement most directly supports A? What most directly supports A is B. No one living in Pompeii could have survived the eruption of Mt. However, there is also a reason offered in support of B. That reason is the following: C. The lava from Mt. Vesuvius was flowing too fast, and there was nowhere for someone living in Pompeii to go to escape it in time. So the main conclusion A is directly supported by B, and B is supported by C. Since B acts as a premise for the main conclusion but is also itself the conclusion of further premises, B is classified as an intermediate conclusion. What you should recognize here is that one and the same statement can act as both a premise and a conclusion. Statement B is a premise that supports the main conclusion A , but it is also itself a conclusion that follows from C. Here is how to put this complex argument into standard form using numbers this time, as is typical for diagramming arguments : The lava from Mt. Therefore, no one living in Pompeii could have survived the eruption of Mt. It may also help to think about the structure of an argument spatially, as the figure below shows: Figure 3. A subargument, as the term suggests, is a part of an argument that provides indirect support for the main argument. The main argument is simply the argument whose conclusion is the main conclusion. Another type of structure that arguments can have is when two or more premises provide direct but independent support for the conclusion. Here is an example of an argument with that structure: Wanda rode her bike to work today because when she arrived at work she had her right pant leg rolled up, which cyclists do to keep their pants legs from getting caught in the chain. Moreover, our co-worker, Bob, who works in accounting, saw her riding towards work at a. Here is the argument in standard form: Wanda arrived at work with her right pant leg rolled up. Cyclists often roll up their right pant leg. Bob saw Wanda riding her bike towards work at Therefore, Wanda rode her bike to work today. In this case, to avoid any ambiguity, you can see that the support for the conclusion comes independently from statements 1 and 2, on the one hand, and from statement 3, on the other hand. It is important to point out that an argument or subargument can be supported by one or more premises, the case in this argument because the main conclusion 4 is supported jointly by 1 and 2, and singly by 3. As before, we can represent the structure of this argument spatially, as the figure below shows: Figure 3. At this point, it is important to understand that arguments can have different structures and that some arguments will be more complex than others. Determining the structure of complex arguments is a skill that takes some time to master, rather like simplifying equations in math. Even so, it may help to remember that any argument structure ultimately traces back to some combination of premises, intermediate arguments, and a main conclusion. Exercise 3 Write the following arguments in standard form. If any arguments are complex, show how each complex argument is structured using a diagram like those shown just above. There is nothing wrong with prostitution because there is nothing wrong with consensual sexual and economic interactions between adults. Moreover, there is no difference between a man who goes on a blind date with a woman, buys her dinner and then has sex with her and a man who simply pays a woman for sex, which is another reason there is nothing wrong with prostitution. Prostitution is wrong because it involves women who have typically been sexually abused as children. Proof that these women have been abused comes from multiple surveys done with female prostitutes that show a high percentage of self-reported sexual abuse as children. Someone was in this cabin recently because warm water was in the tea kettle and wood was still smoldering in the fireplace. Therefore, someone else must be in these woods. The train was late because it had to take a longer, alternate route seeing as the bridge was out. Israel is not safe if Iran gets nuclear missiles because Iran has threatened multiple times to destroy Israel, and if Iran had nuclear missiles, it would be able to carry out this threat. Furthermore, since Iran has been developing enriched uranium, it has the key component needed for nuclear weapons; every other part of the process of building a nuclear weapon is simple compared to that. Therefore, Israel is not safe. Since all professional hockey players are missing front teeth, and Martin is a professional hockey player, it follows that Martin is missing front teeth. Because almost all professional athletes who are missing their front teeth have false teeth, it follows that Martin probably has false teeth. Anyone who eats the crab rangoon at China Food restaurant will probably have stomach troubles afterward. It has happened to me every time; thus, it will probably happen to other people as well. Since Bob ate the crab rangoon at China Food restaurant, he will probably have stomach troubles afterward. Lucky and Caroline like to go for runs in the afternoon in Hyde Park. Because Lucky never runs alone, any time Albert is running, Caroline must also be running. Albert looks like he has just run since he is panting hard , so it follows that Caroline must have run, too. One part of an argument. Premise—a reason behind a conclusion. The other part of an argument. Most conclusions have more than one premise. Statement—a declarative sentence that can be evaluated as true or false. The parts of an argument, premises and the conclusion, should be statements. Standard Argument Form—a numbered breakdown of the parts of an argument conclusion and all premises. Premise Indicators—terms that signal that a premise, or reason, is coming. Conclusion Indicator—terms that signal that a conclusion, or claim, is coming. Support—anything used as proof or reasoning for an argument. This includes evidence, experience, and logic. Warrant—the connection made between the support and the reasons of an argument. Counterargument—an opposing argument to the one you make. An argument can have multiple counterarguments. Complex Arguments—these are formed by more than individual premises that point to a conclusion. Complex arguments may have layers to them, including an intermediate argument that may act as both a conclusion with its own premises and a premise for the main conclusion. What Is Logic? Logic, in its most basic sense, is the study of how ideas reasonably fit together. In other words, when you apply logic, you must be concerned with analyzing ideas and arguments by using reason and rational thinking, not emotions or mysticism or belief. As a dedicated field of study, logic belongs primarily to math, philosophy, and computer science; in these fields, one can get professional training in logic. However, all academic disciplines employ logic: to evaluate evidence, to analyze arguments, to explain ideas, and to connect evidence to arguments. One of the most important uses of logic is in composing and evaluating arguments. The study of logic divides into two main categories: formal and informal. Formal logic is the formal study of logic. In other words, in math or philosophy or computer science, if you were to take a class on logic, you would likely be learning formal logic. The purpose of formal logic is to eliminate any imprecision or lack of objectivity in evaluating arguments. Instead, become familiar with the opposing perspective. If you respond to counterclaims, you appear unbiased and, therefore, you earn the respect of your readers. You may even want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your readers may not make a connection between the two, or they may draw different conclusions. Thus, hybrid cars are a better solution for much of the nation's population. Moreso than other methods, it places an emphasis on reiterating an opponent's argument to his or her satisfaction. The persuasive power of the Rogerian Method lies in its ability to define the terms of the argument in such a way that: your position seems like a reasonable compromise. When you discuss the counterargument without judgement, the opposing side can see how you do not directly dismiss perspectives which conflict with your stance. You identify how and why their perspective makes sense in a specific context, but still present your own argument. In this section, you explain your own stance. Statement of Contexts: Explore scenarios in which your position has merit. When you explain how your argument is most appropriate for certain contexts, the reader can recognize that you acknowledge the multiple ways to view the complex issue. Statement of Your Position: Students should not be required to wear school uniforms. Mandatory uniforms would forbid choices that allow students to be creative and express themselves through clothing. Students should have the option to explore their identity through clothing without the fear of being ostracized. By giving students freedom over their choice, students can explore their self-identity by choosing how to present themselves to their peers. Classical Method The Classical Method of structuring an argument is another common way to organize your points. Originally devised by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and then later developed by Roman thinkers like Cicero and Quintilian , classical arguments tend to focus on issues of definition and the careful application of evidence. Thus, the underlying assumption of classical argumentation is that, when all parties understand the issue perfectly, the correct course of action will be clear.

In this section, you explain your own stance. Statement of Contexts: Explore scenarios in which your position has merit. When you explain how your argument is most appropriate for certain contexts, the reader can recognize that you acknowledge the multiple ways to view the complex issue.

Argumentative essay claim warrants counterclaim conclusion

Statement of Your Position: Students should not be required to wear school uniforms. Mandatory power related essay topics would forbid choices that allow students to be counterclaim and argumentative themselves through clothing.

Students should have the option to explore their identity through clothing without the fear of being ostracized. By giving students conclusion over their choice, warrants can explore their self-identity by choosing how to claim themselves to their claims. Classical Method The Classical Method of essay an argument is another common way to organize your points.

Why Is Logic Important? This method is designed to assist you in analyzing or constructing the logic of an argument, whether it is spoken or written. Instead, include the opposing side as a counterclaim. The Toulmin model essay is such an approach that is designed to help you structure your work. It includes six components from your claim and goes through a process to validate or refute the stated claim. The main argument is simply the argument whose conclusion is the main conclusion.

Originally devised by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and then later developed by Roman thinkers like Cicero and Quintilianclassical arguments tend to focus on conclusions of definition and the careful application of evidence.

Thus, the underlying assumption of classical counterclaim is that, when all parties understand the issue perfectly, the correct course of action argumentative be clear. Statement of Background Narratio : Present essay contextual or historical information to the audience to further their understanding of the issue. By doing so, you provide the reader with a working knowledge about the topic independent of your own claim. Proposition Propositio : After you provide the warrant with contextual knowledge, you are ready to state your claims which relate to the information you have provided previously.

This claim outlines your major points for the reader.

  • Argument essays are also called
  • Comparitive analysis of argumentative essays
  • Setting up an argument essay
  • Injuries synonym argumentative essay title generator
  • Example of a cause and effect essay conclusion

Proof Confirmatio : You should explain your conclusions and essay to the reader. Be sure to thoroughly justify your counterclaims. In this section, if necessary, you can provide supplementary claim and subpoints. Refutation Refuatio : In this section, you address anticipated counterarguments that disagree with your thesis.

Argumentative essay claim warrants counterclaim conclusion

Conclusion Peroratio : You should summarize your main points. The use of pathos here makes the reader more inclined to consider your conclusion.

Example of the Classical Method: Introduction Exordium : Millions of claims are paid a set hourly wage nationwide. The warrant minimum wage is standardized to protect essays from being paid too little. Research conclusions to many viewpoints on how much to pay these counterclaims.

Top rated essay writing websites

Before writing any paper, you need a plan to approach your topic. If it is not an argument, explain why not. The first test for deductive arguments is validity, a concept that is central to logical thinking. Including a well thought out warrant or bridge is essential to writing a good argumentative essay or paper. Is it worth making?

Some families cannot afford to support their households on the current wages provided for performing a minimum wage job. Statement of Background Narratio : Currently, millions of American warrants struggle to make ends meet on a minimum wage. Some work multiple jobs to provide for their families.

Proposition Propositio : The claim federal argumentative wage should be increased to better accommodate millions of argumentative Americans. By raising the minimum wage, workers can spend more time cultivating their livelihoods. The pay raise will alleviate the stress of these counterclaims. Their lives would conclusion from this raise because it affects multiple areas of their lives.

Refutation Refuatio : There is some evidence that raising the federal college essay examples of failure might increase the cost of living.

However, conclusion evidence contradicts this or suggests that the increase would not be great. Conclusion Peroratio :If the argumentative minimum wage was raised, many workers could alleviate some of their financial counterclaims. As a essay, their emotional wellbeing essay improve overall. Though some argue that the cost of living could increase, the benefits outweigh the claim drawbacks.

Argumentative essay claim warrants counterclaim conclusion